From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8911: bs-cycle-next deletes window in some cases. Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:06:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4E009EB0.1050903@gmx.at> <181538AC4C8B4765A99060E0425B9AB5@us.oracle.com> <9170F33E41584E0B8D96DD5EFC84599E@us.oracle.com> <8E864413162C4814BE8EFFD0C1FA1989@us.oracle.com> <4E06FBF8.9040205@gmx.at> <4E0AD02D.4020207@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309461967 5118 80.91.229.12 (30 Jun 2011 19:26:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , 8911@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 30 21:26:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcMsA-0004CO-J8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:25:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59973 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcMs9-00081A-7K for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:25:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKhp-0002vV-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKhj-0004Nc-PZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKhj-0004NN-6x for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKhi-00052A-DI; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8911 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8911-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8911.130945357719301 (code B ref 8911); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8911) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Jun 2011 17:06:17 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKgx-00051F-U3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:06:16 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QcKgw-000511-R8 for 8911@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:06:15 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAMarDE5MCqDH/2dsb2JhbABSp1V4iHi/NoYxBJ5OhCs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.65,451,1304308800"; d="scan'208";a="117803483" Original-Received: from 76-10-160-199.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.160.199]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Jun 2011 13:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 628295912D; Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:06:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4E0AD02D.4020207@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:11:41 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 13:07:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47645 Archived-At: >> Because 99% of the calls are wrong (they just want to display >> a specific buffer and the author did not consider what should happen if >> called in a minibuffer-only frame or in a dedicated window). > Why aren't minibuffer-only frame windows automatically dedicated? Maybe just because they predate the notion of dedicatedness? Or because a minibuffer-only frame will show different buffers at different times (think of echo-area buffers, recursive minibuffers, ...), so "dedicated" isn't quite right. Stefan