From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: HAVE_FTIME, src/m/vax.h, and src/m in general Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <4FB76178.2030504@cs.ucla.edu> <4FB935C2.7090206@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1337565260 8748 80.91.229.3 (21 May 2012 01:54:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 01:54:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Emacs Development To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 21 03:54:18 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SWHp9-0002cJ-6e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 May 2012 03:54:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWHp8-0004Vw-Jj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39750) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWHp5-0004VW-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWHp3-0006bt-S4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.143.162]:40730) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SWHp1-0006bI-FE; Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:07 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAOMAh0/O+K+j/2dsb2JhbAA3DqM0gQiBdQEBBAFWIwULCzQSFBgNJIgTohGMZAkDAQKDPgODcASeboR1hAVT X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="181528153" Original-Received: from 206-248-175-163.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([206.248.175.163]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 20 May 2012 21:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3427E660E0; Sun, 20 May 2012 21:54:03 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB935C2.7090206@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 20 May 2012 11:19:46 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.143.162 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150568 Archived-At: > src/s is a tougher nut to crack, but here's a patch > to get the ball rolling by getting rid of src/m. > I'd like to test it a bit more and then install > it into the trunk. It does affect the msdos and nt > builds and I've tried to include changes when necessary > to build them but have not tested that. Haven't tried it, but I'm curious: Why use #define BITS_PER_SHORT BITS_OF_SIGNED_MAX (SHRT_MAX) rather than #define BITS_PER_SHORT (CHAR_BIT * sizeof (short)) -- Stefan