From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Input events and (interactive "e") Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:08 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83lijeax2n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340513121 16179 80.91.229.3 (24 Jun 2012 04:45:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 04:45:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 24 06:45:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SiehL-0001Ew-0A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:45:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57750 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SiehK-0006zG-Mi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SiehH-0006yz-Nm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SiehG-0004An-9Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:12977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SiehD-00046u-RG; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu0/O+L+Q/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiBwFugmQRAOjM4FYgwU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="192003493" Original-Received: from 206-248-191-144.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([206.248.191.144]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Jun 2012 00:45:08 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 3B21DAE1E4; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 00:45:08 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83lijeax2n.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:04:48 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151122 Archived-At: > And btw, what is the story behind special-event-map, and why should > events be put on that map? Think of "C-x C-s". Should "someevent" be considered as part of the whole key-sequence for the purpose of command lookup, or is "someevent" sufficiently special that it should be run immediately regardless of the previous "C-x" and then ignored from the overall key-sequence which will just read "C-x C-s"? If the latter, then your event should be handled by special-event-map. Stefan