From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12547: 23.3; sh-mode backward-list with case and = Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1351187289 22344 80.91.229.3 (25 Oct 2012 17:48:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 12547@debbugs.gnu.org, Jack Duthen To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 25 19:48:16 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRXN-0004Tv-7c for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 19:48:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33551 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRXF-00084W-Fk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRXD-00084P-3s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRXB-0003Oc-TU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:47:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51583) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRXB-0003OR-Qi for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:47:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRZC-0003nU-10 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:50:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:50:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12547 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12547-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12547.135118734814527 (code B ref 12547); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:50:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Oct 2012 17:49:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33601 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRYK-0003mG-BU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:49:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:37940) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TRRYH-0003m8-Mn for 12547@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:49:07 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q9PHkxZU007678; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:47:00 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D4463B4278; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:46:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:23:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4382=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4382> : streams <845314> : uri <1252263> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:66042 Archived-At: >> sh-mode does not understand this (=G*) syntax. Is it valid? >> Is it equivalent to =G*) or to \(=G*) ? >> If it is valid and you have a pointer to some doc about it, that would >> be very helpful, > http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09_04_05 Thanks. So the "(" in (=G*) is basically silent. Now, all we need is for someone to write the patch ;-) Stefan