From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Different behaviour while debugging? Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:56:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87mwuzkp8i.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361376012 9578 80.91.229.3 (20 Feb 2013 16:00:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:00:12 +0000 (UTC) To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 20 17:00:34 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5w-00052V-Ku for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:00:32 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49269 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5Y-0002vE-Rw for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:00:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59770) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5I-0002sK-07 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 11:00:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5G-0002Qf-I3 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:59:51 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:53345) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5G-0002QW-C1 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 10:59:50 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U8C5U-0004nw-6u for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:00:04 +0100 Original-Received: from 108.161.117.233 ([108.161.117.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:00:04 +0100 Original-Received: from monnier by 108.161.117.233 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:00:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.161.117.233 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YyNn/kLs0KPC+Y4btR+jKGeCknw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:89187 Archived-At: > but inside the 'cond function in the while loop, the out-commented lines > ("comline") are not recognized when run normally My crystal ball is very cloudy but it seems like it's trying to tell me that single-stepping via edebug causes the file's content to be displayed before you run the code, and displaying this content causes it to be font-locked, which ends up adding some syntax-table properties which make those comments recognized as such. Stefan