From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Hash values of symbols: why look at the name? Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:23 -0400 Message-ID: References: <541781F6.7010600@dancol.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1410836454 19148 80.91.229.3 (16 Sep 2014 03:00:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 03:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs developers To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 16 05:00:49 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj0Z-00028Z-Sm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 05:00:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35471 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj0Z-0003cO-JA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59975) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj0O-0003c7-RF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj0F-000092-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:36 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:59673) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XTj0F-00007C-Ar for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:27 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABQCYMGg0rANAmBFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIBAjSGReOH1sHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IPAS-Result: ArYGAIDvNVNFpZEG/2dsb2JhbABQCYMGg0rANAmBFxd0giUBAQEBAgFWIwULCw4mEhQYDSSIBAjSGReOH1sHhDgEqRmBaoNMIQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,753,1389762000"; d="scan'208";a="89821102" Original-Received: from 69-165-145-6.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([69.165.145.6]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Sep 2014 23:00:23 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 5918A660D3; Mon, 15 Sep 2014 23:00:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <541781F6.7010600@dancol.org> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Mon, 15 Sep 2014 17:19:02 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174347 Archived-At: > The hash of a symbol is the hash of its namel; that seems silly, since > symbol equality is based on identity. We should be able to just use the > symbol address instead, right? Sounds right, Stefan