From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: =?windows-1252?Q?=AC?= notation for not? Ref: Add a couple cells to lisp-prettify-symbols-alist Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:01:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20160710052404.GA28783@holos.localdomain> <87oa65eczf.fsf@udel.edu> <87r3b08fhw.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1468246484 4802 80.91.229.3 (11 Jul 2016 14:14:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 14:14:44 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 11 16:14:35 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbyj-0003zp-GT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:14:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33931 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbyi-0007ID-S3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:14:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51778) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbmB-0002Wu-2r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbm5-0007WO-5w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:01:34 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43447) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbm5-0007WH-09 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:01:29 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bMbm2-00076C-JE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:01:27 +0200 Original-Received: from 69-165-156-121.dsl.teksavvy.com ([69.165.156.121]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:01:26 +0200 Original-Received: from monnier by 69-165-156-121.dsl.teksavvy.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:01:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 11 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 69-165-156-121.dsl.teksavvy.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:No7Gxiu8atghOf681yDXhaOHhvY= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:205544 Archived-At: > How about tagging each mapping? (STRING CHAR TAG1 TAG2 ...) > Then the user could include or exclude by tag. It's free-form but I > think it would be hard to provide a good general interface to > include/exclude prettifications otherwise. Where the TAGs are basically names of sets of mappings? I'm not sure we need that much flexibility to justify this amount of redundancy/noise in the code. Stefan