From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: tramp-compat-funcall -> compat-funcall? Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:32 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87lgykci0z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87h997u1rq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87oa3dkct4.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1474725503 27639 195.159.176.226 (24 Sep 2016 13:58:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 13:58:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 24 15:58:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bnnT5-0006Fv-5O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 15:58:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnnT3-0002Aa-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:58:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58344) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnnSX-000294-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnnSR-0003Oa-2M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:39 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:54879) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bnnSQ-0003OF-UV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DgBQALW9BX/63kr2xdGwEBAQMBAQGDLQEBAQEBHoRNhVCxeYYWBAICgWk9EAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGIBAQMBJy8jEAs0EhQYDSSIVQi8VQEBCAIlin2KHAEEmVmRFQGHd4YLjw2BPjUfhGwghgoBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0DgBQALW9BX/63kr2xdGwEBAQMBAQGDLQEBAQEBHoRNhVCxeYYWBAICgWk9EAECAQEBAQEBAV4nhGIBAQMBJy8jEAs0EhQYDSSIVQi8VQEBCAIlin2KHAEEmVmRFQGHd4YLjw2BPjUfhGwghgoBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,296,1470715200"; d="scan'208";a="273467893" Original-Received: from 108-175-228-173.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([108.175.228.173]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 24 Sep 2016 09:57:34 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 66FDB66223; Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:57:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87oa3dkct4.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sat, 24 Sep 2016 08:54:31 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207751 Archived-At: >> There's (if (fboundp ') ( )) already (which is much > Your code snippet misses the `with-no-warnings' umbrella. No, it doesn't: the byte-compiler understands the the if+fboundp means that any call to this function in the branch is "safe" and it won't signal a warning. That's my point. Stefan