From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Skipping unexec via a big .elc file Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:39:10 -0500 Message-ID: References: <9463F91F-DB82-48E1-BE01-1E2BC8DA0766@raeburn.org> <831swxzbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3z2wphb.fsf@gnu.org> <83tw9bb42m.fsf@gnu.org> <349ED8B9-C34B-495B-9FB5-E72CE6EFCA38@raeburn.org> <87inpni6xa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <8360lmesso.fsf@gnu.org> <3B044D64-7C94-42D7-BE1B-7A9CA76C5A67@raeburn.org> <83k29xc49v.fsf@gnu.org> <2C5C5C6E-9D73-4613-948B-C15B93968717@raeburn.org> <83poiy8cnv.fsf@gnu.org> <83y3xk7i07.fsf@gnu.org> <7DB61BDC-41C5-41A5-BB01-B15F2B03A81E@raeburn.org> <491113AD-F03F-4E9D-8005-F4C430E60A16@raeburn.org> <5AF6553B-9ECD-4F0B-8841-55656D4D1B99@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486420788 20815 195.159.176.226 (6 Feb 2017 22:39:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 22:39:48 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 23:39:44 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1carwm-0005E9-9o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:39:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1carwr-0003uJ-QN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:39:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32790) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1carwK-0003uD-A2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:39:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1carwH-0001BI-2u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:39:16 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:59079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1carwG-0001BD-TD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 17:39:13 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id v16MdAAY011989; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:39:10 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2BCD7603BE; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 17:39:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5AF6553B-9ECD-4F0B-8841-55656D4D1B99@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Mon, 6 Feb 2017 14:08:06 -0500") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV5941=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <5941> : inlines <5674> : streams <1731803> : uri <2372731> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212066 Archived-At: > Is this a known (and filed) bug? I don't think it's filed, no. I've known about it for a while now, and it came up "recently" in the discussion about reproducible builds. Until then it wasn't considered as a real bug, I think, more like a quirk. > In any case, doing =E2=80=9Cmake bootstrap=E2=80=9D from clean trees (whi= ch I=E2=80=99m assuming > will byte-compile files in the same order each time) Not sure if make guarantees a specific order of execution in that case, but in my experience I think it does operate in a deterministic way, indeed. Stefan