From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Making 'eq' == 'eql' in bignum branch Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: <29f933ac-a6bf-8742-66a7-0a9d6d3e5a88@disroot.org> <87lgaio7xd.fsf@tromey.com> <877em1cb0i.fsf@tromey.com> <765767b2-d2e5-a9a6-f724-d58ecf4847bb@cs.ucla.edu> <76081b5d-8c10-0a37-2c97-d4864c0faa80@cs.ucla.edu> <09153aed-361d-4f82-d9ac-b502314769ae@cs.ucla.edu> <83lg91dqd4.fsf@gnu.org> <87bm9pytma.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535302660 18621 195.159.176.226 (26 Aug 2018 16:57:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2018 16:57:40 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Paul Eggert , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, pipcet@gmail.com, Lars Ingebrigtsen , eliz@gnu.org To: Tom Tromey Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 26 18:57:35 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ftyM3-0004jo-J4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 18:57:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49783 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftyO9-0004MD-UW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftyO3-0004M5-Ro for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:40 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftyO3-0005bV-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:39 -0400 Original-Received: from pmta31.teksavvy.com ([76.10.157.38]:13456) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ftyNz-0005ZT-LO; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:35 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EaBAAe3IJb/z6ZCkxaGgEBAQEBAgEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEIAQEBAYNPgWSNCYtDAYIMEyABl2wLhGYEAgKDECI3FQECAQEBAQEBAgICaSi?= =?us-ascii?q?FOQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0khS4IoyyKX4ltggCEJIpWApssCZAGgTEBhwaGEZM9D?= =?us-ascii?q?IFXI4FSMxoIMIMlgiQXjjMjjR8BAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2EaBAAe3IJb/z6ZCkxaGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEIAQEBAYNPgWS?= =?us-ascii?q?NCYtDAYIMEyABl2wLhGYEAgKDECI3FQECAQEBAQEBAgICaSiFOQEEAVYjBQsLN?= =?us-ascii?q?BIUGA0khS4IoyyKX4ltggCEJIpWApssCZAGgTEBhwaGEZM9DIFXI4FSMxoIMIM?= =?us-ascii?q?lgiQXjjMjjR8BAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,291,1531800000"; d="scan'208";a="44147321" Original-Received: from 76-10-153-62.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([76.10.153.62]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Aug 2018 12:59:33 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1EEF3AE240; Sun, 26 Aug 2018 12:59:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87bm9pytma.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Sun, 26 Aug 2018 10:34:21 -0600") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 76.10.157.38 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228942 Archived-At: > Two, as an argument to forward-comment: (forward-comment > most-positive-fixnum). This also seems safe, as the argument is > a comment count, not a buffer position. That said these could perhaps > be changed to (forward-comment (point-max)). Yes, point-max is better. Same seems to apply to the cases in syntax.el. Stefan