From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/accurate-warning-pos: Solid progress: the branch now bootstraps. Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:04:18 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20181117124534.GA8831@ACM> <83muq7u9rk.fsf@gnu.org> <20181123130904.GA2916@ACM> <20181125193050.GH27152@ACM> <2c2ae483-3309-f79d-07a5-30af1f49058b@cs.ucla.edu> <20181125212920.GK27152@ACM> <60ac9dfc-b540-89f9-68ea-ec7cceaa8511@cs.ucla.edu> <83in0kijz0.fsf@gnu.org> <9e216e61-7d95-94f0-cbee-593b4f32ced2@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543263741 2650 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2018 20:22:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:22:21 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 26 21:22:17 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNOX-0000Qz-OU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:22:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38649 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRNQe-0001QY-2Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53418) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRN7P-0001G3-Df for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:04:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRN7K-0000gC-Gu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:04:31 -0500 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=33168 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gRN7K-0000eA-7o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 15:04:26 -0500 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gRN5B-0005AU-HS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:02:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:cJN3yBQOEKoepBleJg75x5XC+9o= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231415 Archived-At: > Yes, the only way it's plausible is if we have just one source-code instance > of the interpreter, parameterized by whether it's doing things the slower > (byte-compiler-oriented) way or the faster (current) way, and then partially You going to have to define "the interpreter". Is the code of Fmemq part of your definition of "the interpreter"? Stefan