From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Imports / inclusion of s.el into Emacs Date: Sat, 02 May 2020 13:01:03 -0400 Message-ID: References: <831ro2tqqx.fsf@gnu.org> <4a1fd3f4-df92-c756-9874-4d07b54148ac@yandex.ru> <83v9lesapw.fsf@gnu.org> <83pnbms9m8.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="14107"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Richard Stallman , Emacs developers To: =?windows-1252?B?Sm/jbyBU4XZvcmE=?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 02 19:02:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jUvWm-0003Zb-BL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 19:02:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50478 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUvWl-0002QE-Bu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:02:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUvVr-0001CU-8o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:01:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUvVq-0008Kg-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:01:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jUvVk-0008Jq-6o; Sat, 02 May 2020 13:01:08 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 80708450843; Sat, 2 May 2020 13:01:06 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 583D7450840; Sat, 2 May 2020 13:01:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1588438865; bh=M9bbgigPRz96bF+8xeGF8tQBh3I/r3NFId3SVekFWpc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=IH3SQskW2aU330Su/E9XHWnDKMcHPQtlnzo8Rm+L8jIjzJEc+oT8PYsn8eLXY4mdJ jUWjv0it5mqjdSp0NYkXcGUWINqTbJ/QhGb8d2uz05ifb+TAdduRAlGmHj2AvF6b5s OMDcOMG0iIdu+VJ60IuCpkvk26042kytj7IQPNZJzI2GYE85gjnuDWE/7kw+S/V9ZT q8TmjmGtAfU1cMgZKxO+LolU8TciOnO5m+xhXzJSvdoKi9wu7/W7Jw3c6xpYWYJoyl /NwfqqsZEt/E1nhKsjNTQEYIVOvKPsAVhbs9s1gNe6BMBDAQx7qlrtg1NryegqRwkH caZ4w3XknJQdg== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.3.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2BC112040A; Sat, 2 May 2020 13:01:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (=?windows-1252?Q?=22Jo=E3o_T=E1vora=22's?= message of "Sat, 2 May 2020 15:55:25 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/02 12:48:41 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:248503 Archived-At: > Some of us are trying to tell you is that the Elisp manual is a > gold mine, too. If you see parts where it is not, report it. > Lisp languages are traditionally organized differently. Why choose? Is `multibyte-string-p` really a better name than `string-multibyte-p`? Structuring the name space does not have to come at the cost of something else, AFAICT. Sometimes/often we won't be able to choose a good structuring, but even in those cases we're no worse than now. Stefan