From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: decision on moving core packages to ELPA; also move to obsolete? Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:06:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <86a6ugnopl.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <83im94b17m.fsf@gnu.org> <834kknatxs.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1nqaph6.fsf@gnu.org> <83eejqak4s.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtyd8wep.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft458s3v.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15942"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org, daniele@grinta.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 16 21:09:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kpd6a-000417-Pk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:09:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48960 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpd6Z-0004yk-SM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:08:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59984) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpd4l-0002e2-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20481) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kpd4h-0006ii-RS; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:07:07 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B07C1441A26; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:07:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4ADF6441A20; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:07:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1608149221; bh=YtBClv1wwkJo6pN2Zg4D3LSX3nm7t+ABvK/vhw63Wsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=eUj+66wSmdAlkUWeK564XDLLSukzImnArjEycQcA7xueVxh5pI/JSZWfDh/XssnOK 6S5o1EZfQ3EJIAATXFW6zMiaZa1M22FuF6I6f4zxD5PumEnqIFbWtmhWEvMpBd4qsB AHuirsYa+X/VP3pVyh+DQr95LJSQFc2QkenQq4lalSHjVraAKUTbrCP1pi5w49FKhf LPbzMl76o5bpn93AZ3FXBamdW9jTR8b4xRNy/PBiCllv67uVCndhTeN2F4pG4ZKnzo 1ZTLZ/nMODg5Nv9vx3sS9T+/TUYEeMzTnyU5CH1BZOcFnSASjMGm4NGltxkABfA4nM GwZ+acUokwrtA== Original-Received: from alfajor (69-165-136-52.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.136.52]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DCA11204DC; Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:07:01 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83ft458s3v.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:32:04 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:261048 Archived-At: > Are you talking about something that already works, or about something > that _could_ work, after some changes? If the former, then where's > the code to support it? > > My question was about the last part: it seemed to describe how things > _should_ work, but I'm not sure we already have that implemented. Do > we? What I'm describing is the use of a facility that was implemented for another use-case scenario. There is no code to write to use that facility: just add the relevant directory to `package-directory-list` and you're done. So yes, it's implemented and it works. Stefan