From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gnus using lexical-binding Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:53:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87sg6iea57.fsf@tcd.ie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2139"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 10 14:54:57 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l9pxI-0000Rh-En for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 14:54:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37302 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9pxH-0008Cm-Gn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:54:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33518) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9pwb-0007kR-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:54:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:49068) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l9pwX-00041r-1V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:54:12 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8EE4B1002F2; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:54:07 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 493C5100229; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:53:57 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1612965237; bh=xrwlNmUaE8TcKKwbKuozj22xg3hGBDk0MJ19jBqkU2Q=; h=From:To:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=f88xGxapTM2Ngc95OFWphw9Yj78r9mC1bU99q+IrWJAigSyesL1vkD0e9m21+tUu7 gFqOqynNNumKkQrEDqgbe6W3qxIFN7uY3jmvDhlq6c4cg8ygNWd3UJm39H/dpj/nEY wF9vcva5+rQeK1sfqseP7Ma95UtqLwxuzdw+GXxMBA3T9Qsxr1EaISw6c8sd7N7Xt1 4wDVFkijNgtuPy+7wXe40HMyoTYON5t4pvxH3dqyEJ5AmjMA6rwa0OIRPTfiE7dqc3 U3OzSh23As7ohZ4D7KhmN0TvBE0OBqVL9P1hc2OyBGAcsE28zaEbjdqizSH6VdeYDE cES3z3qBejD9A== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [216.154.41.47]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20FAA1201C3; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:53:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:24:18 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:264276 Archived-At: > The fix and the whole pre-existing Gnus "user defines special function" > mechanism feels very magical. Amen. > Could we instead define a standard way of calling these custom > user-defined functions in Gnus, passing them an explicit alist or > plist of special properties? I'd welcome such a change, Stefan