From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Request to add tomelr package to GNU ELPA Date: Tue, 03 May 2022 10:38:13 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16817"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs developers To: Kaushal Modi Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 16:41:09 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nlti8-0004Dy-Hk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 16:41:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33602 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nlti7-0000dX-5V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 10:41:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46226) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nltfX-0005NB-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 10:38:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:32005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nltfU-00047Y-UB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2022 10:38:26 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 4966E100280; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:38:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id A51F7100006; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:38:21 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1651588701; bh=H23BQ37T9Nn6LUF0+vWW+UZJhdhwy6tipfW7fBjy3ec=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=mfcP8kk6dhJSllsohCLVACd4v64kADfW/ATmcnqb3/uB5/z9dzcMjZ7BFxB1Zne+Q PLYP0VPISO5O6iVh1eqPKGJYRcB/h4QBkRxTTT9YLtoZ3wEuAe+/EpQw6Y7BfBUnCn 09lMWy3PQj/+zQTr0lHdoLAIE4Gc5mR01+HbpucOBEmqUbVwT0ux0yM1H73/C06oxi EW4QCyylME/k0oP6WlFFhEDkp0tYlqbe+L+uer4+dRJu9OU/pV4oOwS3htCzwYE5Go hhacSBre4iLxpNg8Hlw2FkGgyd88zicTrRVkrNNoPzL6fZtorBw3TPUYMjcFGF4eH4 e0WkWPxwDnedA== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.221.51]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D9DE120211; Tue, 3 May 2022 10:38:21 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Kaushal Modi's message of "Tue, 3 May 2022 10:29:51 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:289108 Archived-At: Kaushal Modi [2022-05-03 10:29:51] wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 9:09 AM Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Thanks, I just pushed it to GNU ELPA. > Thanks! That was quick. I just happened to be in the neighborhood. >> "TOML aims to be a minimal configuration file format that's easy to read >> due to obvious semantics." >> >> I can't believe someone would write something like that with >> a straight face. [ Unless that someone is very naive, I guess. ] >> :-) > > It's easy to read as long as you are dealing with normal INI style key > assignments and maps. But once you start having arrays of maps, I > agree that it's not very readable. My point is just that it's only "easy to read" and "obvious" for those already familiar with such syntax. Just as is the case for pretty much all syntaxes. Stefan