From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: xref-query-replace-in-results error message after xref-find-definitions, was: Re: bug#58158: 29.0.50; [overlay] Interval tree iteration considered harmful Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:48 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83edvuhaby.fsf@gnu.org> <831qruh67o.fsf@gnu.org> <83y1u2foli.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgehe6iq.fsf@gnu.org> <95113379-99d8-eba4-f980-a7fca11430d5@yandex.ru> <834jwfmn5a.fsf@gnu.org> <838rlohzeo.fsf@gnu.org> <83mta2g91p.fsf@gnu.org> <237a3e26-03b8-a2a9-90bd-d50c3670a131@yandex.ru> <83wn96efyn.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36198"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 11 16:11:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oiFz1-0009Cm-N7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 16:11:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47630 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiFz0-00059M-II for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:11:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiFvI-0001O0-Kn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:21537) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oiFvF-0006M0-VC; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 8B77B10012E; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 201FC100091; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:49 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1665497269; bh=1K/F1XZahF0vkwyNZ8kEKxZYaawn6S2l7Y5+I+pu910=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=ReYao1l1ikEM/M5pYY22/78kf3G23MwogPsKqaDxMMr4g+oAcafk+LIK9sXYsqxaP 1/3ujibIRXjm2qa22E+8DNtzvf48Cp0RcgMqS1uLiTW2gl7hMZtmTbzvbl3SfppAJy GfmsO7ANVNHVSzk4qfiHtc+jEfsooYao9UQpbceNfV6GgdXszP7TvbVDwfUCXl4Thn 0MlC96A+y72kmt/+ILBNbNYJbDC0la9FF9c7uWzCB6ejuq2kcLWScrnTInE3aFZXmj 7APP9/hjXkGlXPHAplQe5OgxsfAFoT2SMIiHsoDsQOpeR1PR5k4sebEB1waonR1W90 Bvtdyz9tnlNmA== Original-Received: from pastel (65-110-220-202.cpe.pppoe.ca [65.110.220.202]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E5EC3120BA3; Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:07:48 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2022 10:04:28 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297489 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier [2022-10-11 10:04:28] wrote: >>> >> What is a "subset of matches"? > [...] >>> Cannot perform replacements in this search's results > > Not sure if it's been proposed already, but how 'bout something along > the lines of "There may be more matches ". Or "This list is probably incomplete"? Stefan