Re: vc-find-revision-no-save?

[Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>]

Philip Kaludercic [2022-10-29 06:46:00] wrote:
> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider    ]]]
>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,     ]]]
>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>
>>   > I can answer this one: because back when we wrote this code, the "Git"
>>   > of the day was called "CVS" and getting a historic revision required
>>   > fetching it from the centralized server, so you were usually quite happy
>>   > to keep a local copy, even if you had to erase them manually every once
>>   > in a while.
>>
>> I still sometimes use CVS, and this feature is still useful with it.
>
> In that case the suggestion to change the behaviour depending on the VCS
> should be fine.  If a VCS requires a network connection, storing the
> files locally can be helpful.

Note that, IIRC, the way the code works, if `vc-find-revision-no-save`
is non-nil you get an unsaved "file buffer", so it just takes a `C-x
C-s` to write the file to its "usual" place (i.e. `FILENAME.~REV~`,
IIRC) if you think it's worthwhile.

For that reason, I'm not convinced we need a special per-VCS handling
of this.


        Stefan