From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [postmaster@012.net.il: Delivery Notification: Delivery has failed] Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <20080628193535.GS6711@volo.donarmstrong.com> <87d4m0k7jg.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1214764716 14753 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2008 18:38:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: svenjoac@gmx.de, don@donarmstrong.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 29 20:39:21 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KD1o1-0007aI-Al for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:39:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53890 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KD1nB-0000Yo-3P for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:38:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KD1mi-0000Ou-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KD1mh-0000Ny-0j for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:38:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34635 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KD1mg-0000No-NW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:58 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:16350) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KD1mY-0003Y0-U4; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:51 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQFACtzZ0hFxIdG/2dsb2JhbACBW6xzgXo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.27,723,1204520400"; d="scan'208";a="23741555" Original-Received: from 69-196-135-70.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.135.70]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 29 Jun 2008 14:37:49 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2A3CD835A; Sun, 29 Jun 2008 14:37:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 29 Jun 2008 21:19:01 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100153 Archived-At: >> >> I think Rmail should be fixed to not send replies to Resent-* addresses. >> > Maybe, but it's kinda scary: this code has been in Rmail since October >> > 1996. >> >> That's probably why it needs to be updated: the RFC is pretty clear. >> Can you take care of it? > Yes, but I won't have time until 4 weeks from now. If it can wait, > then fine. I do not think this is urgent, indeed. As long as you don't forget. > Btw, why does the bug tracker need these headers? Fixing the above > won't help those who use older Emacsen, so if using the headers is not > really necessary, perhaps we should lose them nonetheless? I don't know why debbugs adds those Resent-* (or is it added elsewhere?) fields. Don? Stefan