From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Moving to bzr? Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:09:52 -0500 Message-ID: References: <871vviif6s.fsf@xemacs.org> <87mye6xnsr.fsf@xemacs.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1231193859 29303 80.91.229.12 (5 Jan 2009 22:17:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:17:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 05 23:18:50 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LJxmb-0001BG-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:18:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46383 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJxlL-000452-UN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:17:31 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJxe4-0001t3-EW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:10:00 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LJxe0-0001sI-Dh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38459 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LJxdz-0001s7-Gt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:09:56 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:38011 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LJxdy-0001Ro-6z; Mon, 05 Jan 2009 17:09:54 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArMEAMsTYknO+JnM/2dsb2JhbACBbMwQhXKBaQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.36,334,1228107600"; d="scan'208";a="31825320" Original-Received: from 206-248-153-204.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([206.248.153.204]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 05 Jan 2009 17:09:52 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0A15B84D0; Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:09:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87mye6xnsr.fsf@xemacs.org> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:35:48 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:107615 Archived-At: > I don't think comparison to CVS or Subversion update is relevant, In the context of whether or not to switch from CVS to Bzr, it is the only relevant comparison. Stefan