From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#5483: 23.1.91; EDE : proj-automake : files in subdirectories have no `ede-current-project' Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:40:03 -0500 Message-ID: References: <873a1qxans.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <4B62176A.7050609@siege-engine.com> <86ocka2pby.wl%lluis@fulla.xlab.taz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1265039893 21090 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2010 15:58:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 15:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Chong Yidong , Eric Ludlam , 5483@debbugs.gnu.org, "Eric M. Ludlam" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Llu=C3=ADs?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 01 16:58:09 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Nbyf7-0002O9-H0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:58:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34202 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbyf6-0003hq-GL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:58:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbyed-0003TZ-5o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:57:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=41596 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Nbyeb-0003T9-Mu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbyeY-0002d2-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:57:33 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:47622) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NbyeW-0002cS-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbyOb-0000TK-Ua; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:41:01 -0500 X-Loop: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:41:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 5483 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 5483-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B5483.12650388111788 (code B ref 5483); Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:41:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 5483) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2010 15:40:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbyNn-0000Sn-Gp for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181] helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NbyNl-0000Sc-2E for 5483@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:40:09 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAJ6EZktFpaN9/2dsb2JhbACBM9kbhEUEilo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,383,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="55063896" Original-Received: from 69-165-163-125.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.163.125]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2010 10:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DDE347F8A; Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:40:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <86ocka2pby.wl%lluis@fulla.xlab.taz> =?UTF-8?Q?("Llu=C3=ADs"'s?= message of "Sun, 31 Jan 2010 17:48:01 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 10:41:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:34838 Archived-At: > Well, my lisp ability is rather limited, but I'll launch a message on the > mailing list, with the information I've gathered. > Question is, where should any development go into? CEDET cvs or Emacs' bzr? It's probably better for it to go into the Emacs bzr, because it's a lot easier for Eric to merge from our repository than the other way around (for legal reasons on his side). Eric, what do you think? Stefan