From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding completing-read-function? Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:03:07 -0500 Message-ID: References: <09A3268D77B2468CA279813722859771@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1293574045 19470 80.91.229.12 (28 Dec 2010 22:07:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 22:07:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 'Leo' , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 28 23:07:20 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PXhhQ-0002Fn-5s for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:07:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40484 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PXhhP-0000vl-FF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43173 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PXhh7-00009X-F2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:07:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PXhdM-0001ZN-1s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:03:09 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:40704 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PXhdL-0001ZG-Ve for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:03:08 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEANvtGU1FpZcL/2dsb2JhbACkMXS/CIVKBIRljhs X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,241,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="86635816" Original-Received: from 69-165-151-11.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.151.11]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 28 Dec 2010 17:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 1741D58AC9; Tue, 28 Dec 2010 17:03:07 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:45:04 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:134018 Archived-At: >> > Then that should have been the approach for >> > `read-file-name-function' as well. >> Yes. Feel free to go back to travel back in time and fix it there. >> In the mean time we can do the right thing for new `foo-function's. > How about fixing `read-file-name-function' the same way now, so the > two will be symmetric? In the vanilla Emacs sources only Ido uses > `read-file-name-function' at present. 3rd parties can > adjust accordingly. Fine by me, Stefan