From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11131: 24.0.94; Apropos bookmarks Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <81sjgqqyt2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1333111616 16559 80.91.229.3 (30 Mar 2012 12:46:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11131@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jambunathan K Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 30 14:46:55 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbEA-0004vi-UA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:46:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57625 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbEA-0000Iw-4U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60945) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbE2-0000IZ-KB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:46:48 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbDw-0007KT-AJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:46:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.43] (port=39510 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbDw-0007Jf-6w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:46:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbiM-0001V7-Cn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:18:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11131 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11131-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11131.13331134555727 (code B ref 11131); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:18:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11131) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Mar 2012 13:17:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46342 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbhu-0001UK-U8 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:17:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:56044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SDbhs-0001UB-IR for 11131@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 09:17:33 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9MCqRV/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="170667392" Original-Received: from 76-10-164-85.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.164.85]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 63BCC59276; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:45:59 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <81sjgqqyt2.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:56:49 +0530") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58337 Archived-At: > Please provide an ido-like completion read for C-x r b. It's a bit late to change things for 24.1, but for 24.2 we can adjust. Which part of "ido-like" would you like to see there? > Please provide a convenient default for C-x r m. You can work out the > details. C-x r m already provides a default, so could you give some more details as to what kind of default would be more "convenient"? Stefan