From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Subdirectories in `lisp' Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:49 -0400 Message-ID: References: <877grkehl2.fsf@caeruleus.net> <505F574D.1050707@cs.ucla.edu> <876274lzio.fsf@gnu.org> <871uhri21g.fsf@caeruleus.net> <87ehlphypr.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348665899 5266 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2012 13:24:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:24:59 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 15:25:04 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrbr-0005GS-W5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:25:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54929 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrbm-00031b-Ut for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40443) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrbk-0002zJ-Cp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrbe-0005Eq-Fs for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:56 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:59302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGrbe-0005Em-Ba for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:50 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAG6Zu09FxLT4/2dsb2JhbABEtBGBCIIVAQEEAVYzPxIUGA2IQAW6CY0mgx4DozOBWIMF X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.75,637,1330923600"; d="scan'208";a="200008148" Original-Received: from 69-196-180-248.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.180.248]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 26 Sep 2012 09:24:49 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 909DB5938D; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:24:49 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87ehlphypr.fsf@gnu.org> (Chong Yidong's message of "Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:20:48 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153581 Archived-At: >> RefTeX consists of eleven Lisp files. It might not be a bad idea to put >> them into their own directory. > But I have to agree with RMS; it still doesn't seem worth giving reftex > its own subdirectory. BTW, the main reason is to avoid lengthening load-path too much, so maybe a good alternative is to have a subdirectory but not add it to load-path. Instead of (require 'reftex-parse) you'd do (require 'reftex/parse). Stefan