From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: unwind-protect for lexical binding Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:20:54 -0400 Message-ID: References: <1394509379969-316523.post@n5.nabble.com> <1394568583856-316572.post@n5.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1394630469 31594 80.91.229.3 (12 Mar 2014 13:21:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2014 13:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Sergey Mozgovoy Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 12 14:21:15 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WNj5u-0007Na-DK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 14:21:14 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60601 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNj5t-00061w-TI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:21:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNj5j-00060i-OI for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:21:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNj5c-00037g-Ey for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:59150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WNj5c-00037V-53 for Emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:20:56 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhAKABK/CFFMCppy/2dsb2JhbABEvgwEA3sXc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: AhAKABK/CFFMCppy/2dsb2JhbABEvgwEA3sXc4IeAQEEAVYjEAsOJhIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="51451976" Original-Received: from 76-10-154-114.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([76.10.154.114]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 12 Mar 2014 09:20:55 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D23BE6057F; Wed, 12 Mar 2014 09:20:54 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1394568583856-316572.post@n5.nabble.com> (Sergey Mozgovoy's message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2014 13:09:43 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170291 Archived-At: >> Have you looked at the trunk version of bytecode.c ? > No, I haven't. I implemented this thing about a half a year ago, > and this is the first time I tried to make it public. Seems to > be too late :) Well, the new opcodes are pretty much unused so far (since the default for byte-compile--use-old-handlers is t) and 24.4 is not yet released, so if you find some problem with the new opcodes, it's not too late. Stefan