From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Prickliness of the "invalid byte code" stuff Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87tvcq9b0w.fsf@igel.home> <83v9x2svmf.fsf@gnu.org> <83fto6sphn.fsf@gnu.org> <83sgs5r20q.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="185691"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 19 18:34:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hddXG-000mC0-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 18:34:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40318 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hddXF-0002iD-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hddP3-00046f-DD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hddP1-0000Lt-7D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:56713) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hddOm-0000AK-Fg; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:25 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id E195D1004B3; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:21 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B3A75100228; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1560961520; bh=jHrfmzQ0agNxvPO1i67HyaLQuZNlAODOVQW9+vd6P0A=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=nWwmTCeXZG1awc93kmbTGEChX59bIkPwaEWyOo0iZ8DkXd8vU/WxwdcFnHbr7g9H3 4WCTCpxx9WFyRd85MmQ1DpVygVoIfoUnGSfXvSuaxDm3i/1PnZJ0nyyZ8qVqCUzWS3 vGXbX0TND9tL0hGf0h0S4JinhhV4LNiXdgVQPXuAYqyUdGtUq25EAnXXmUQ8NoQpx5 qTJyek2cxp9B1cyKsb2mNuxdMCwccNbpl/ixgIzcLOfmBIvKszZ2c/xgJkDAxsyBNM SONH2w4WNIloXr4xNutHLwfMRrmNSwEkYE6Us6NPB+5YDORr38pqPlJ7weMTp97QQi aqzgNer6dasVw== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [108.161.117.173]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 73BE7120314; Wed, 19 Jun 2019 12:25:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83sgs5r20q.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 19 Jun 2019 19:08:37 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 132.204.25.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:237918 Archived-At: > I understand, but I was curious why these 12 files do use the > variable, while all the rest don't. IOW, what is (or was) so special > about these files? I'm to blame for the pcvs-util.el, I think, but I must say I can't remember nor figure out why I did that. For the others, I believe the expectation is that it's common to use only a small part of those files (like a handful of functions from CL or one particular command from dired-aux), which is the most favorable situation for byte-compile-dynamic. Stefan