From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Native compilation: the bird-eye view Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:38:19 -0400 Message-ID: References: <83o8qocd32.fsf@gnu.org> <83ftbzdewp.fsf@gnu.org> <83blmndbpo.fsf@gnu.org> <838shrdb1c.fsf@gnu.org> <837dxbd93b.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="128141"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Paul Eggert , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 03 16:39:01 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jgUXk-000XCW-Sl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 16:39:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43082 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgUXj-0002kK-TL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:38:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgUXF-0002HN-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:38:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:20666) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jgUXD-0005x2-TF; Wed, 03 Jun 2020 10:38:28 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 332E21002FC; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:38:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 932F2100234; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:38:20 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1591195100; bh=gnp+BPcJsdPk0g7SRzBSLLfdEeoxvFmsoDCNKjI0Xm0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=PZNZ5rY2p76gxHxRh4U3hQmwBN3Ol9a2/S5K9F++YAQoWpn2DPuHvzhd0YXFhHGBr Vz+TguQBIlryEHh+4zHmjkzmasvLe55Oh6bh9gGqJxdG37kvhrmAmXk6CGyAgczvt3 UQ4EXSqIWTlaKwScBesme8I78iimABQvpy5fvSTe02bVKyAWUlOWJwczMjHMCAqF5H 4fRba1qb9Fo0Ufe+Y3QaYdqAO8LsIBv4NPVXvVOSfwic9j49AxK63FH+qUC4KCuxJ/ reokOqbIQdLud787yi+0XgJzNyzKv4Z9SiY1eKgbLW2qBxZ9uwbm92QD4Rum2Hm+5e vadDJP8ftMNtA== Original-Received: from alfajor (76-10-137-254.dsl.teksavvy.com [76.10.137.254]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 23D21120EE7; Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:38:20 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Andrea Corallo's message of "Wed, 03 Jun 2020 14:23:21 +0000") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/03 10:13:04 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251810 Archived-At: > This is a good idea. My concerns are on how the user would interact > with this cache ex: searching if a given eln exists, what's its date, > removing one eln etc. > Should the user goes always through an API we provide? Or do we want have > everything 100% transparent? I think the idea would be to aim to make it "100% transparent" for normal users. Stefan