From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Relevance of `baud-rate' in the 2020s? Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:22 -0400 Message-ID: References: <833625l9wv.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9f0j00x.fsf@gnu.org> <83imb0ivua.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="619"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: stefan@marxist.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 23 22:46:08 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kW3wt-000AbI-BI for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:46:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54832 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW3ws-00044s-Dc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:46:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW3vI-0003Ms-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:25151) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kW3vG-0007ky-Ff; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:27 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id B7183105CA6; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6D0FB100267; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1603485863; bh=WUYkSqTHN6iEwDtEpLBv6uj8vMGqV9bz9b4fGDBA3mo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=XUesSBd0E1JFsZwiLjeNhvkZUF3eomnxRkUL96Tbv9m7LjbDwCSo3UsQSfN/XcRRg eUEIdzYqW4Dyns5ypLcvglr5J8foxo4JuVAuanMDewzQcIY4HsUB0rhLL1nxKrojwI oxG/LdVGkzzrzmetIzE4D8nd4/CnQ1hrN2MW9CCqFjsPjNlpvyf3Ima3QZdPWMf3RU VK2ZUIA18UYt9p/tJhaAHIP/7FrRTJ7NKhuGcS/qu9mpmgJ1BqO0vECGtC+/Tk03wx u6rpsY0NjshVUHasOP5zjeaPtbfuuj68B18FUVr7irDYmbB/R9FLI/LpLrd9uxYV3S EFXLFz5LtddfQ== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [157.52.9.240]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B6F4120183; Fri, 23 Oct 2020 16:44:23 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83imb0ivua.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 23 Oct 2020 22:30:21 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/23 16:44:24 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:258395 Archived-At: >> What do you think of removing `baud-rate` and replacing it with >> a `low-bandwidth-mode` global minor mode? > I thought that was what I proposed up-thread? I guess I was a bit ... slow? ;-) Stefan