From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:35:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19186"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Emacs Developers To: Jean Louis Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 21:37:01 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nO3oL-0004pk-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 21:37:01 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45998 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nO3oK-00004s-17 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:37:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40082) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nO3nV-0007qb-M5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:41982) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nO3nQ-0008Oo-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:08 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 85C9F44267E; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 26BAA44267B; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:01 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1645907761; bh=bhSQcZuqZH/iZzlXdtl61zryl+UUHk2A1MC0K7C885Q=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jnujMl5uqU2+VINQHvqoZLCbuFWmyHJBzewinhvq26/zh5k4Uibm7bqSipAfRS5vS zC+KMcGOjcaygPXREaagzpLDhCsWtvriubH+eMAPiI3iK1vjXsrzmNYYWowrimE7Lb YiJK9IzvEZH6zPQ0FQuN93AIKihBJHh2jFJZv7PMg34UEKRRrtrUSvU6mrs7X11jKf IpPWkQ4CbU4PwOrFRPfV1L4yiTuEFaqsMHrFnVn1GKirow8k2rvGhD9Lk7ON3rf8Jn 4ezOY6w4peJhtM+Prs/vLGfxAwvcvhYfVDX9JQV36KDA+18Zh0noEn0EC4tjzr73gb RlA4LTKA6hwcA== Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.208.76]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1FA6120EF3; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 15:36:00 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Jean Louis's message of "Sat, 26 Feb 2022 16:19:24 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:286706 Archived-At: Jean Louis [2022-02-26 16:19:24] wrote: > Failed to verify signature archive-contents.sig: > Bad signature from 066DAFCB81E42C40 GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2019) > Command output: > gpg: Signature made Fri 25 Feb 2022 01:05:04 AM EAT > gpg: using RSA key C433554766D3DDC64221BFAA066DAFCB81E42C40 > gpg: BAD signature from "GNU ELPA Signing Agent (2019) " [unknown] > > after M-x package-list-packages Do you still see that? If it was transient, than I think it's sadly normal given the way the scripts are written, there is a short time window between the update of `archive-contents` and `archive-contents.sig`. Stefan