From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66136: 29.1; byte-compiler reports "misplaced interactive spec" with empty fct in lexical environment Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:35 -0400 Message-ID: References: <58a3814205a241729c60ed277fa871b9@vodafonemail.de> <87o7hvs2gf.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box> <87leczrysc.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box> <838r8y92aw.fsf@gnu.org> <87y1gx528i.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4533"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= , 66136@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jens Schmidt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 22 23:40:06 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsb-0000uj-OT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 23:40:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsO-0004Y1-IZ; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsN-0004Xf-Bw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsN-0003ot-3b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:51 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsX-0005Uh-Sh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2023 21:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66136 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 66136-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66136.169541879821106 (code B ref 66136); Fri, 22 Sep 2023 21:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66136) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2023 21:39:58 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37364 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsU-0005UM-2v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:35702) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qjnsR-0005U7-4n for 66136@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:56 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 6EBC3442B44; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1695418776; bh=CVA6sHSQyhwIklvmFbY3UyGrfyRZy/Eh0IR6Ca0s1P4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dkiXIVftDSnAcd4quWk7laVNbgfLZgYuHiXhj81dopMmgInsyFbN+ZZEOyW+9j6Sr 1wJf0Q3Ryg5zVLkjUbvV/3y0unCPpe6IPGlsw3SN9xdledFyWMALELpshykj2thzwH 21NMBpXs9H47OBaEb0jt2Ju8Uz37cdaCVpPFf5bP8/CrcugPIaKyC1GxMab1lHjy+u nlXs4Bg7t2WXzytKQDY+/cWK7RuQ/y7V63zXgiqTOces4TGvSHE5xrLXm90EMz16Ny srUrhqN/fyG3fLClUyERxsI/J6HgwYsEVfSJybj+8MJq6Hb4INOIsVtsCVNCITIcot 26d+CqmGg3E+A== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id C5D29442B43; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:36 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from pastel (69-165-140-3.dsl.teksavvy.com [69.165.140.3]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 928FB1202E2; Fri, 22 Sep 2023 17:39:36 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87y1gx528i.fsf@sappc2.fritz.box> (Jens Schmidt's message of "Fri, 22 Sep 2023 23:26:05 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:271127 Archived-At: > I managed to cobble up something like that, but are you really sure you > want to warn about an empty/missing body? I have a number of arguments > against that, the main being that `cl-defgeneric' is processed through > `macroexp-parse-body' exactly like `defun' - and for `cl-defgeneric' an > empty body seems to be the rule and not the exception. Hmm... for `cl-defgeneric`, indeed, an empty body is normal (it doesn't mean "return nil" but it means the absence of a default method). Very good point. I know Mattias played with this part of the code (mostly to try and figure what to do about the ordering of the various possible kinds of declarations, which is a related yet different issue). Maybe he has a more informed opinion. Stefan