From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#68244: hash-table improvements Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:43:50 -0500 Message-ID: References: <170438379722.3921.9312235725296561206@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <08314177-5AE9-4352-94A0-641830B4094D@gmail.com> <19265EA5-E6F3-446C-AD9B-763693CF0A48@gmail.com> <6F3E332D-54ED-4E70-BBAA-A207750B52F8@gmail.com> <13877748-AFAB-4310-A0CA-104752C8BF2D@gmail.com> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35788"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Gerd =?UTF-8?Q?M=C3=B6llmann?= , Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , 68244@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 13 13:45:02 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs9l-00095v-Nx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 13:45:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs9Y-0003FX-Fl; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs9V-0003Ew-Q6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs9V-00022S-Hf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:45 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs9l-0004i9-Ty for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68244 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 68244-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68244.170782826118035 (code B ref 68244); Tue, 13 Feb 2024 12:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 68244) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2024 12:44:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42821 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs97-0004go-FM for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:31273) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rZs93-0004gZ-N2 for 68244@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 5048A440B2E; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:43:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1707828233; bh=4ENyXpdMpA7g2QNDUUbxHmCx+n4NydKKzKlQlWTgXFg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=OLO+bZaXjmpcjT7hv+4Fna85IpU6e9sF8Kz49961L1g9gVJls4w8XOwKfg8Z3A2ip +cXOZXdqIhjnc1fjz/LWT98qLIL/Je73bkaN58Xh6Xu/RbqsSHq5zJqRuZfNOHX/hB TAKL4mPUIgr28IVpZ15tXRj2tL2YUucrerdKGfOvbmtlrWyY8ISsMVQ5bQ05FwOcxZ ie99ysyPH08PCXHuH0ORFNMV+OUv+gsOVSlsN3kk0XuzSsGUMpREeFGRXFgeoFs9D9 Bscg67Yu6rRC/D3arJe1P8l8fXlUtzOpfZmGAe7RGRUZrqaugDlzjiorQIUCpMorDV iqwJ3dMsDZzVg== Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg3.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 13AC0440BF0; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:43:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from pastel (unknown [45.72.197.152]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEB58120B70; Tue, 13 Feb 2024 07:43:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <13877748-AFAB-4310-A0CA-104752C8BF2D@gmail.com> ("Mattias =?UTF-8?Q?Engdeg=C3=A5rd?="'s message of "Tue, 13 Feb 2024 11:12:37 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:279961 Archived-At: > A more worrying problem is code that uses `obarray-make` but assumes the > result to be vectors. It may be unsafe to let obarray-make return an obarray > object for that reason. I don't think it'd be "unsafe": it just introduces a bit of incompatibility. But `obarrayp` has been with us since Emacs-25 and it's trivial to change code using `vectorp`, so I wouldn't worry about it. > With Stefan's suggestion, if I understood it right, > we'd have `obarray-make` return (vector 0). I did not suggest such a thing. Stefan