From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: flyspell doesn't catch local variables? Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:44:43 -0500 Message-ID: References: <87wt54x484.fsf@lrde.org> <36648.128.165.123.18.1165430581.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: dough.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1165434318 6474 80.91.229.10 (6 Dec 2006 19:45:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:45:18 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 06 20:45:15 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gs2hY-0003tj-IG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:45:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gs2hY-0004Gw-0p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:45:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gs2hM-0004GY-UG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Gs2hJ-0004EK-Dm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:44:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gs2hJ-0004EH-7R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:44:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [132.204.24.67] (helo=mercure.iro.umontreal.ca) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1Gs2hI-00073I-Ig for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Dec 2006 14:44:53 -0500 Original-Received: from hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.50]) by mercure.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51442CF239; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:44:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (faina.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.26.177]) by hidalgo.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1E753FE0; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:44:43 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id DA9426C8CA; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 14:44:43 -0500 (EST) Original-To: herring@lanl.gov In-Reply-To: <36648.128.165.123.18.1165430581.squirrel@webmail.lanl.gov> (Stuart D. Herring's message of "Wed\, 6 Dec 2006 10\:43\:01 -0800 \(PST\)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-DIRO-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-DIRO-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-DIRO-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (score=-2.82, requis 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82) X-DIRO-MailScanner-From: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:63376 Archived-At: > Out of curiosity more than correction, why use `function' in your calls to > *-hook? It's not an environment where you could actually inline a > function call or aid compiling in any way that I can see... You either have to put function' or `quote' (or their respective shorthand ' or #'), so if it's a function you may as well use `function'. It's at least harmless and could even be considered better because it gives more information about the intent. Stefan