From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should nXML be included Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:51 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87zm35e2jc.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <87r6ohdzoo.fsf@dur.ac.uk> <86tztdxns6.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1181661126 28868 80.91.229.12 (12 Jun 2007 15:12:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:12:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Peter Heslin , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 12 17:12:04 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hy82M-0000pj-23 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 17:12:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy82L-0002rK-B2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy82F-0002qH-DN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy82D-0002pP-Ph for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hy82D-0002pM-JN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:53 -0400 Original-Received: from tomts5.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.25] helo=tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hy82C-0000w8-II; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:52 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home ([70.55.144.170]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20070612151151.CUBP23861.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@pastel.home>; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:51 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 71950803E; Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:11:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <86tztdxns6.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue\, 12 Jun 2007 16\:14\:49 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Solaris 8 (1) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:72697 Archived-At: > Copyright headers are not necessarily correct. That's why one needs > the written assignment on file for contributions. If James has an > assignment that only covers his (explicit) contributions to Emacs, he > most certainly can't be held responsible for the accuracy of some > headers in a file he never contributed to Emacs. He does have papers on file that cover Emacs as well as nXML-mode (and then some). But before being able to include it, we need to check the contributions by others, which is usually the trickier part. The distribution does not come with any ChangeLog, so we will very much the help of James to figure out what was contributed by whom. Stefan