From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: files in emacs/lisp/language/ not byte compiled Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:38 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200807040059.m640xuuC018632@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1215204422 18321 80.91.229.12 (4 Jul 2008 20:47:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 20:47:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dan Nicolaescu , emacs-devel@gnu.org, Kenichi Handa To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 04 22:47:48 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KEsBz-0004Gp-8a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 22:47:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49326 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEsB8-0005LU-Bp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:50 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEsB3-0005KT-TJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KEsB2-0005K6-PA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59736 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KEsB2-0005K3-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:44 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca ([206.248.154.182]:2686 helo=ironport2-out.teksavvy.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KEsAy-0001gL-NE; Fri, 04 Jul 2008 16:46:40 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgEAC4pbkhFxIdG/2dsb2JhbACBXK14ggI X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.30,304,1212379200"; d="scan'208";a="23980163" Original-Received: from 69-196-135-70.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.196.135.70]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 04 Jul 2008 16:46:39 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B53CF806F; Fri, 4 Jul 2008 16:46:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 04 Jul 2008 15:55:45 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:100356 Archived-At: > The only possible advantage to recompile would seem to be the > progmodes/cc-mode.elc explicit rule, for cc mode weirdness. On a single-processor (and/or when not parallelized), recompile can also be significantly faster. Stefan