From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#2222: 23.0.90; Labels in RMAIL Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:02:25 -0500 Message-ID: References: <200902172355.n1HNtqVp022483@zogzog.maillard.mobi> Reply-To: Stefan Monnier , 2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234927453 23579 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2009 03:24:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, 2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, jpff@codemist.co.uk To: Xavier Maillard Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 18 04:25:28 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZd3v-0002JH-Ha for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:25:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZd2b-0000H1-As for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:24:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZd2E-00009D-2E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:23:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZd2C-00008h-LS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:23:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42156 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZd2C-00008U-87 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:23:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:54002) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZd2B-0005MX-GA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:23:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1I3NZno012866; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:23:36 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1I3A4Uw008883; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:10:04 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , Rmail Maintainers Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:10:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 2222 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,rmail X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 2222-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B2222.12349261546406 (code B ref 2222); Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:10:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 2222) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 18 Feb 2009 03:02:34 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.182]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1I32Vqp006400 for <2222@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:02:32 -0800 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApsEAE8Im0lMCpTK/2dsb2JhbACBbtIPhBMGgzU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.38,225,1233550800"; d="scan'208";a="34015704" Original-Received: from 76-10-148-202.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO ceviche.home) ([76.10.148.202]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2009 22:02:25 -0500 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 8B637B4123; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:02:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200902172355.n1HNtqVp022483@zogzog.maillard.mobi> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Wed, 18 Feb 2009 00:55:52 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:23:41 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25385 Archived-At: > After some thinking, I tend to agree. Even more, I think we > should deport all X-RMAIL-* headers outside the rmail file and > keep it untouched. Just like it's better to avoid adding a magic message, it's also better to avoid adding a separate file, I think. OTOH adding a special header is pretty harmless. Admittedly, adding a separate file would allow major performance improvements, but it would need to be able to react correctly to external changes (after all, that's one of the motivation for switching to mbox). Stefan