From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Any objection to adding completing-read-function? Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <09A3268D77B2468CA279813722859771@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300717345 9405 80.91.229.12 (21 Mar 2011 14:22:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 14:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 15:22:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1fzw-0001Su-AW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 15:22:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1fzu-0002b5-6Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39124 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q1fzj-0002Yg-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1fzh-0005n3-WC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:49664 helo=ironport2-out.pppoe.ca) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q1fzh-0005mz-PZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:05 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAF78hk1Ld/X5/2dsb2JhbAClcniITbdJhWMElWk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.63,219,1299474000"; d="scan'208";a="97407486" Original-Received: from 75-119-245-249.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([75.119.245.249]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 21 Mar 2011 10:22:05 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id B0C5858AF5; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:22:04 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Sun, 20 Mar 2011 21:07:13 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.183 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137477 Archived-At: >>> + (funcall read-file-name-function >>> + prompt dir default-filename mustmatch initial predicate)) >> Maybe (or read-file-name-function #'read-file-name-default) is in order >> here for backward compatibility, in case external code used >> a let-binding to nil. > Hi Stefan, > Any objection to this patch that changes read-file-name-function to a > non-nil default? Go for it, Stefan