From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8626: 24.0.50; (elisp) Region to Fontify after a Buffer Change - Why a child of Multiline Font Lock? Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 14:20:04 -0300 Message-ID: References: <078B0330CA3C43959F4638AC9055DB76@us.oracle.com> <86CA0AD6E28C4F9687E6B9F09D00218B@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1304702472 8390 80.91.229.12 (6 May 2011 17:21:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2011 17:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8626@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 19:21:08 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOiB-0001uc-I5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 19:21:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59555 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOiB-0005Hg-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:07 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:43616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOi7-0005Hb-T0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOi6-00027F-VC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOi6-00027B-TZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOi6-0000pO-BM; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 17:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8626 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8626-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8626.13047024143120 (code B ref 8626); Fri, 06 May 2011 17:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8626) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 May 2011 17:20:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOhK-0000oH-Ir for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:20:14 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOhI-0000o6-R7 for 8626@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:20:13 -0400 Original-Received: from 121-249-126-200.fibertel.com.ar ([200.126.249.121]:46427 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QIOhC-0004pG-RL; Fri, 06 May 2011 13:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0CD3366248; Fri, 6 May 2011 14:20:04 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <86CA0AD6E28C4F9687E6B9F09D00218B@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Fri, 6 May 2011 08:00:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 06 May 2011 13:21:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:46288 Archived-At: > > It is about having to extend the refontification area because > > refontifying a single-line is not sufficient, presumably because the > > major mode has to handle a multiline font-lock construct. > > The node _says_ it is about what you say up to the comma. You then > add "presumably...", which is _not_ part of the node content. It's just an application of reasoning: is "a single-line is not sufficient", that must mean that there's more than one line involved. I added the "presumably" because some user somewhere might decide he likes to use this hook for something else. > You seem to be fighting making this text clear. Please clearly specify > how and how much the (current) node content is related to multiline > font-lock constructs. That's what is missing. I'm in a bad position to fix it, because AFAICT the text already says very clearly what the var does, and when it makes sense to use it. Could you provide a sample patch that would make the text clear to you? Stefan