From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Pretest begins end-June Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 19:31:51 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87y61ojhp4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83zkm4f3es.fsf@gnu.org> <83sjrvgaf5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1306794726 8088 80.91.229.12 (30 May 2011 22:32:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 22:32:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 31 00:32:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB0C-0005Sh-PE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 May 2011 00:32:00 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43592 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB0C-0001H2-5o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:32:00 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33460) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB09-0001Go-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:31:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB08-0001cy-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:49797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB08-0001cu-IN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:31:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [190.194.233.124] (port=40304 helo=ceviche.home) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QRB07-0005q0-8T; Mon, 30 May 2011 18:31:56 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 82F21660D3; Mon, 30 May 2011 19:31:51 -0300 (ART) In-Reply-To: <83sjrvgaf5.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 May 2011 00:12:30 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139917 Archived-At: > So in sum, it sounds like I'll need 6 to 7 weeks from now, barring any > unforeseen obstacles, personal disasters, etc. I guess we could push the feature freeze to end of July. But any new feature introduced after late June will need to get permission. How does that sound? The feature freeze is not a code freeze, so it's OK if you need some minor redesign to some part of the bidi/xdisp code as long as it is necessary to fix a bug rather than add a new feature. The distinction between bug and new feature in this context should mostly be "is it a regression w.r.t Emacs-23". Stefan