From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9934: 24.0.91; `region-active-p' definition Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1320178197 4728 80.91.229.12 (1 Nov 2011 20:09:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 20:09:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9934-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 01 21:09:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKea-0007Mq-R1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 21:09:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35289 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKea-00004y-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKeX-0008Vt-GU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKeW-0001ql-GP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:45 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKeW-0001qe-EV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKgk-0000xl-Rw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:12:02 -0400 Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 9934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 9934@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Original-Received: via spool by 9934-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D9934.13201782883654 (code D ref 9934); Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9934-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Nov 2011 20:11:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKgC-0000wt-CL for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:11:28 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RLKgA-0000wm-Dc for 9934-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:11:27 -0400 Original-Received: from faina.iro.umontreal.ca (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id pA1K91SZ003146; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: by faina.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 82FDCB465D; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:09:06 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 1 Nov 2011 10:12:45 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV4028=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9286 : core <4028> : streams <697483> : uri <997098> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 16:12:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:53406 Archived-At: > When is there ever any reason to test (and transient-mark-mode > mark-active)? When is that value ever different from just the value of > mark-active? emacs -Q M-x transient-mark-mode M-: mark-active RET C-SPC M-: mark-active RET Stefan