From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11067: 24.0.94.1; diff-buffer-with-file Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:19:26 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1332613270 10884 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2012 18:21:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11067@debbugs.gnu.org To: Arni Magnusson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 24 19:21:09 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SBVaP-0003xX-9M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:21:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBVaO-0005sU-E7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBVaL-0005rh-MF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBVaI-0005U2-Ms for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SBVaI-0005Ts-KJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:21:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SBW4H-0006pf-TF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:52:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:52:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11067 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11067-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11067.133261506326194 (code B ref 11067); Sat, 24 Mar 2012 18:52:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11067) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Mar 2012 18:51:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37161 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SBW3K-0006oO-8A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.183]:34363) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SBW2l-0006nS-Pj for 11067@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:51:00 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAKU/KE9FpYqr/2dsb2JhbACBX5x7eYhwnhmGGQSbGYQJ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,1,1325480400"; d="scan'208";a="169901846" Original-Received: from 69-165-138-171.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([69.165.138.171]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 24 Mar 2012 14:19:27 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 7DA3D58F52; Sat, 24 Mar 2012 14:19:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Arni Magnusson's message of "Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:54:16 +0000 (UTC)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:58094 Archived-At: > 2. Set `diff-command' to "winmerge" and `diff-switches' to nil I think I'm beginning to understand the problem a bit better. I.e. the immediate problem for you is the fact that the new code uses "-L