From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: coccinelle patch suggestion Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:15 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340832268 21985 80.91.229.3 (27 Jun 2012 21:24:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 21:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dan Nicolaescu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 27 23:24:27 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjzio-0005xY-0k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 23:24:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32848 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjzio-00035t-09 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44957) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjzim-00035F-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjzik-0003dZ-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:19 -0400 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:51687) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sjzij-0003cO-VU; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q5RLOGVC004015; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:16 -0400 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id D522EAE505; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 17:24:15 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Dan Nicolaescu's message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2012 13:12:22 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Level: X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.2 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 2 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.2, RV4263=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.2.0.9309 : core <4263> : streams <775144> : uri <1151022> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:151240 Archived-At: > And EXFUN just adds an unneeded level of obfuscation that doesn't help > code readability. I'm not sure the "plain" form is better, because of its length (especially if there are 3 args or more). Stefan