From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Info: Console Vs GUI difference? Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:46 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383136562 8643 80.91.229.3 (30 Oct 2013 12:36:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 12:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "T.V. Raman" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 30 13:36:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV0H-0005PV-TF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 13:36:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52181 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV0H-0003Ap-Dx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:36:05 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55505) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbV07-00038k-De for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbUzz-0000SF-HW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:55 -0400 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.182]:52866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VbUzz-0000S9-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:47 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IPAS-Result: Av4EABK/CFFsoXfp/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYjBQsLNBIUGA0kiB4GwS2RCgOkeoFegxM X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="36662504" Original-Received: from 108-161-119-233.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home) ([108.161.119.233]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA; 30 Oct 2013 08:35:46 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4DAF360309; Wed, 30 Oct 2013 08:35:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (T. V. Raman's message of "Wed, 30 Oct 2013 02:27:49 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.182 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164691 Archived-At: > Once Emacs has triggered the user error in Info as before, what > I'm observing that when in the info buffer (and only in the info > buffer) something in Emacs appears to be calling signal under the > covers -- and the signal is trapped and suppressed > **after**after every user action. I can't reproduce it here. At least (setq debug-on-signal t) doesn't show me any signal thrown. Which signal is thrown? Does (setq debug-on-signal t) catch it? If so, what does the backtrace say? Stefan