From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r116379: Replace "Maintainer: FSF" with the
	emacs-devel mailing address
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500
Message-ID: <jwv38jq3i1a.fsf-monnier+emacsdiffs@gnu.org>
References: <E1WCfma-0005gV-3S@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<jwvppmu3nrs.fsf-monnier+emacsdiffs@gnu.org>
	<1lfvnqvqmk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392059317 27887 80.91.229.3 (10 Feb 2014 19:08:37 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 19:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
To: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 10 20:08:44 2014
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1WCwDh-0000A2-9L
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:08:41 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57678 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1WCwDg-0005uH-Mx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:40 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34705)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1WCwDX-0005tT-Jn
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:37 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>) id 1WCwDR-0007QF-Q4
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:31 -0500
Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:52416)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>)
	id 1WCwDR-0007QA-M3; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:25 -0500
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+KAF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYYCwULCw4mEhQYDQ0XE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU
X-IPAS-Result: Av8EABK/CFHO+KAF/2dsb2JhbABEvw4Xc4IeAQEEAVYYCwULCw4mEhQYDQ0XE4gLBsEtkQoDiGGcGYFegxU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,565,1355115600"; d="scan'208";a="47223192"
Original-Received: from 206-248-160-5.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO pastel.home)
	([206.248.160.5])
	by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/ADH-AES256-SHA;
	10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500
Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848)
	id 761586011D; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:08:24 -0500 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <1lfvnqvqmk.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of
	"Mon, 10 Feb 2014 12:12:19 -0500")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not
	recognized.
X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169513
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/169513>

> Not sure I agree, but I certainly would not object to adding something
> about a Maintainer being wanted in some cases (but not all). But then
> interested people should contact... emacs-devel.

For files included in Emacs, then I don't see a need to include extra
references to emacs-devel@gnu.org (just like we don't have such in the
C files).

For files in ELPA, emacs-devel@gnu.org isn't right either: the
maintainer address is where the commit-script sends a copy of the diff,
and I don't think we don't want to send those to emacs-devel@gnu.org.


        Stefan