From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19145: 24.4; prettify-symbols-mode inconsistent behavior Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:23:56 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416673467 14488 80.91.229.3 (22 Nov 2014 16:24:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:24:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19145@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ken Mankoff Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 22 17:24:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTw-0001Y2-IT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:24:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45928 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTw-0000kb-59 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTm-0000kW-Bn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTe-0003Ip-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44704) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTe-0003Il-PE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTe-0007MR-C2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:24:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19145 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19145-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19145.141667344028288 (code B ref 19145); Sat, 22 Nov 2014 16:24:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19145) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2014 16:24:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41917 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTc-0007MA-83 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:24:00 -0500 Original-Received: from chene.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.20]:47861) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XsDTa-0007M2-9D for 19145@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:23:58 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by chene.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id sAMGNuUN001369; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:23:56 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 713BF43AC; Sat, 22 Nov 2014 11:23:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Ken Mankoff's message of "Fri, 21 Nov 2014 14:22:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5133=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5133> : inlines <1554> : streams <1346833> : uri <1835707> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96424 Archived-At: > Much improved! Of my examples, only one case no longer works which is > delta_x or foo_x_x_x_x, for example. This would seem to indicate that the syntax-table of the major-mode in effect has marked the underscore character with "symbol syntax" (denoted confusingly enough by an underscore character, in the `C-u C-x =' help). Such a setting is appropriate is "delta_x" is one identifier, but not if it's supposed to be 3 elements (identifier "delta", infix "_", and identifier "x"). So, is this setting correct (i.e. does your language treat "delta_x" as a single identifier, and you're trying to prettify subparts of identifiers)? Stefan