From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19537: Manual documents nonexistent functionality of package-upload-buffer Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:31:21 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420727919 9809 80.91.229.3 (8 Jan 2015 14:38:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 14:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19537@debbugs.gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 08 15:38:33 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E8D-00022q-DF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 15:32:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E8C-0004uW-MN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:32:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35773) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E89-0004uQ-Ea for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E84-0003uN-Ez for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58824) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E84-0003uI-CQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:32:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E83-00085S-Jg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:32:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:32:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19537 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19537-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19537.142072749131002 (code B ref 19537); Thu, 08 Jan 2015 14:32:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19537) by debbugs.gnu.org; 8 Jan 2015 14:31:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39957 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E7W-00083v-3H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:31:30 -0500 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:52812) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9E7P-00083g-2L for 19537@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:31:23 -0500 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t08EVLlW016504; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:31:21 -0500 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 60FA51F56; Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:31:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Kelly Dean's message of "Thu, 08 Jan 2015 03:40:31 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5180=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5180> : inlines <1730> : streams <1370077> : uri <1841706> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98114 Archived-At: > But in fact, it must be visiting a simple package; it can't be a multi-file > package. For the latter, only package-upload-file works (and even that works > only after the patch for bug #19536 is applied). The package shouldn't document the "upload" functionality of package-x, since that's a functionality that pretty much noone uses (most/all ELPA archives use a different way to "upload" a package to it). Stefan