From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20357: 25.0.50; deactivate-mark behavior broken Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:56 -0400 Message-ID: References: <87pp735a42.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429295002 26549 80.91.229.3 (17 Apr 2015 18:23:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:23:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 20357-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Oleh Krehel Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 17 20:23:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAv1-0004kb-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 20:23:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42992 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAv0-00061q-Jn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAuw-00060n-Cy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAus-0004kt-CY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAus-0004kp-8l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAus-0007Np-1Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stefan Monnier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20357 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20357-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D20357.142929498028368 (code D ref 20357); Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20357-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Apr 2015 18:23:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59306 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAup-0007NU-Uh for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:23:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:51252) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YjAuo-0007NM-Sl for 20357-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:59 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t3HIMuQO017249; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:56 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 309061FB6; Fri, 17 Apr 2015 14:22:56 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Oleh Krehel's message of "Fri, 17 Apr 2015 18:02:57 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5279=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5279> : inlines <2748> : streams <1424093> : uri <1909294> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101648 Archived-At: > (with-temp-buffer > (insert "foobar") > (set-mark (point)) > (goto-char (point-min)) > (indent-region (point-min) > (point-max)) > mark-active) > In 24.5 it returns nil, which is correct. While in 25 it returns t. Why is it more correct to return nil than to return t? > This is a recent change, 24.5.2 doesn't have this bug. > > (let (deactivate-mark) > (indent-region (region-beginning) > (region-end))) > > Expected behavior: the mark isn't deactivated. At least in 24.4, the mark does get deactivated in my test. Stefan