From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reimplementation of `called-interactively-p' Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:55:33 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1441292287 10459 80.91.229.3 (3 Sep 2015 14:58:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Alexander Shukaev Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Sep 03 16:57:58 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVxe-0002h6-4D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 16:57:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48853 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVxd-0008Bj-IA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:57:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44589) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVvO-0003tz-N1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:55:39 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVvL-0002LP-D3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:55:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:42701) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZXVvL-0002LB-79 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2015 10:55:35 -0400 Original-Received: from ceviche.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id t83EtXLL019960; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:55:33 -0400 Original-Received: by ceviche.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 4233666110; Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:55:33 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Alexander Shukaev's message of "Thu, 3 Sep 2015 02:18:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 1 Rules triggered RV5418=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9393 : core <5418> : inlines <3750> : streams <1499203> : uri <2031673> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189505 Archived-At: > I found [1] quite interesting. Was this already incorporated into > Emacs at some point or not? I rewrote called-interactively-p in Elisp for Emacs-24.4 (IIRC), but I can't remember using that code for that, so in a sense no it was not incorporated. > I guess it would be reasonable to address those bugs. I don't know if the bugs he refers to are only present in the old C implementation or if they're also present in the new Elisp implementation. Stefan