From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [elpa] master 1d46de7 07/50: removed lexical-binding: t (confusing because not necessary) Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:25:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20151109033535.5602.4896@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447043153 23130 80.91.229.3 (9 Nov 2015 04:25:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2015 04:25:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Michael Heerdegen To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 09 05:25:43 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zve1V-0002rF-Qn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2015 05:25:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50071 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zve1U-00082A-TA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:25:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zve1C-000822-Nk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:25:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zve19-0007Gr-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:25:22 -0500 Original-Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com ([206.248.154.181]:58229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zve19-0007G2-FJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 23:25:19 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0CtCwA731xV/6sLr7hcgxCEAsEMCYdLBAICgTw5FAEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDYhbCM8jAQEIAQEBAR6LOoUFBxaEFwWMMKcPgUUjgjuBWyCCeAEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0CtCwA731xV/6sLr7hcgxCEAsEMCYdLBAICgTw5FAEBAQEBAQGBCkEFg10BAQMBViMFCws0EhQYDYhbCM8jAQEIAQEBAR6LOoUFBxaEFwWMMKcPgUUjgjuBWyCCeAEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,465,1427774400"; d="scan'208";a="177565894" Original-Received: from 184-175-11-171.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([184.175.11.171]) by ironport2-out.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 08 Nov 2015 23:25:18 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 0884AAE250; Sun, 8 Nov 2015 23:25:17 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Mon, 09 Nov 2015 03:35:40 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 206.248.154.181 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193675 Archived-At: > removed lexical-binding: t (confusing because not necessary) In which sense is it confusing? lexical-binding:t is expected to be "the standard" for new Elisp code. It has various advantages such as giving more precise/detailed warnings, have cleaner semantics, and even better performance (tho this is largely hypothetical/theoretical for now). Stefan