From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [Emacs-diffs] scratch/widen-less a4ba846: Replace prog-widen with consolidating widen calls Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:32 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20171129233237.27462.23351@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171201154913.GB3840@ACM> <1e542021-e389-cca4-6acd-349efddb2652@yandex.ru> <20171201223529.GG3840@ACM> <4a94ec5c-efdd-50f1-ff4d-277f5f45c2df@yandex.ru> <83lgil1qme.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13x1j2s.fsf@gnu.org> <34abea95-c7f7-e8fa-8407-8c2fd2a4cfe1@yandex.ru> <83y3mkzw1n.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv2zzv7z.fsf@gnu.org> <83o9nexy48.fsf@gnu.org> <83d13uxug5.fsf@gnu.org> <41e3f343-816f-d2db-6575-6ef43d54957f@yandex.ru> <838tecuqjb.fsf@gnu.org> <83609guppd.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512882103 9596 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2017 05:01:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 05:01:43 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 10 06:01:40 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNtkB-0002Ji-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 06:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43457 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNtkI-0002bL-QH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47650) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNtkC-0002bF-Rq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNtkC-0007sC-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:40 -0500 Original-Received: from pmta11.teksavvy.com ([76.10.157.34]:55230) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNtk8-0007ox-CN; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:36 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GqDADUvixa/3GcSC1cGwEBAQEDAQEBC?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAYM+gVqdR4F9FJkNCoUxCgKEX0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBA2gohSQBBAF0BQULCw0?= =?us-ascii?q?nBwsUGDGKMwipHyECikABAQEHAgElg2iCC4ZqixcFkyOPbpceAYoCKIc7ll6BO?= =?us-ascii?q?zYjgU8yGggwgh9FgwaBbCOKJwEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2GqDADUvixa/3GcSC1cGwEBAQEDAQEBCQEBAYM+gVqdR4F?= =?us-ascii?q?9FJkNCoUxCgKEX0MUAQEBAQEBAQEBA2gohSQBBAF0BQULCw0nBwsUGDGKMwipH?= =?us-ascii?q?yECikABAQEHAgElg2iCC4ZqixcFkyOPbpceAYoCKIc7ll6BOzYjgU8yGggwgh9?= =?us-ascii?q?FgwaBbCOKJwEBAQ?= X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,386,1508817600"; d="scan'208";a="13350401" Original-Received: from unknown (HELO fmsmemgm.homelinux.net) ([45.72.156.113]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Dec 2017 00:01:35 -0500 Original-Received: by fmsmemgm.homelinux.net (Postfix, from userid 20848) id 2B8E9AE303; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 00:01:32 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83609guppd.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 09 Dec 2017 13:05:02 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 76.10.157.34 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220842 Archived-At: > Just to make myself clear: these reasons would have been very relevant > and serious if we were now considering the prog-indentation-context > stuff for inclusion in Emacs. But we are 2 years past that stage, so > other considerations take precedence, I think. Could we just mark them as obsolete in Emacs-26? That would be good enough for me. Stefan