From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Lexical binding doesn't seem to be faster? Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 14:59:57 -0400 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="222593"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Hi-Angel Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 10 20:11:22 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h33r0-000vlo-B3 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:11:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48661 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h33qz-0003r3-AL for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:47829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h33q8-0003A2-KX for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:10:29 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h33g0-00029Z-IP for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from pruche.dit.umontreal.ca ([132.204.246.22]:54788) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h33g0-00029I-CE for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 15:00:00 -0400 Original-Received: from pastel.home (lechon.iro.umontreal.ca [132.204.27.242]) by pruche.dit.umontreal.ca (8.14.7/8.14.1) with ESMTP id x2AIxvV2019497; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 14:59:58 -0400 Original-Received: by pastel.home (Postfix, from userid 20848) id C7D596A17C; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 14:59:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Hi-Angel's message of "Sun, 10 Mar 2019 21:47:22 +0300") X-NAI-Spam-Flag: NO X-NAI-Spam-Threshold: 5 X-NAI-Spam-Score: 0.1 X-NAI-Spam-Rules: 3 Rules triggered GEN_SPAM_FEATRE=0.1, EDT_SA_DN_PASS=0, RV6499=0 X-NAI-Spam-Version: 2.3.0.9418 : core <6499> : inlines <7030> : streams <1815324> : uri <2810356> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 132.204.246.22 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "help-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:119603 Archived-At: > If you say "several seconds enough", then it's already there, the > benchmark with GC enabled takes 9 seconds. Hmm... then there's a problem with the sampling. Is this in a batch Emacs session? What OS? I think this might deserve its own bug report. Stefan