From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gather a list of confusions beginner tend to have Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:02 -0400 Message-ID: References: <875z8ortot.fsf@gkayaalp.com> <20200909075750.GA31381@tuxteam.de> <83o8mejogk.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1r8hjxc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6665"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: tomas@tuxteam.de, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 11 15:51:32 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kGjSd-0001bQ-J6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 15:51:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34424 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGjSc-0001VP-K8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:51:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57352) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGjOt-0005M4-Di for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca ([132.204.25.50]:43925) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kGjOp-00041O-NT; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:38 -0400 Original-Received: from pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id 3DC16100250; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:33 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (unknown [172.31.2.1]) by pmg1.iro.umontreal.ca (Proxmox) with ESMTP id DE25F102492; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=iro.umontreal.ca; s=mail; t=1599832022; bh=I/t+dcDDbTT367VDV/hs/zsvQH21nZgTtSSCAYiyUXA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=pwZhS4xwFnfho9JMhNLZIuGPiLOgxHELr7qYrTZaCX+gu7IVOawt825ZbcUX2WgD8 dHSECmhCKbdyJzSm2OXFyVREIcTR5Iica82wxQ8RktLyOK3VbfjcRODsyxegHqJc9U yubvEN7PwjIg4Ry5GAHvAs9FiDtvHwWwUJHWqmwfmKr4OcNh52/uC8IcOxwpfAWdQN pDxLSn9LPK7Z2aZZnAuL+FtIyZsVcLt0ab6P/khHFj6i63rF4DE3AYlXIepkeV01fP EZrLhvzMKOAkHwhkHsI8HY5GAlwst2r/Prv6FT1y/YTzEA332zNW+bITkKqB43YWNI J3wjlN2Xi8n1Q== Original-Received: from alfajor (unknown [45.72.232.131]) by mail01.iro.umontreal.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 992911204BB; Fri, 11 Sep 2020 09:47:02 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <83r1r8hjxc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2020 10:06:07 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.204.25.50; envelope-from=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca; helo=mailscanner.iro.umontreal.ca X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/09/11 09:47:34 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Spam_score_int: -42 X-Spam_score: -4.3 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:255169 Archived-At: >> > > > But according to IBM's "Common User Architecture" (aka "CUA" [4]), >> > > > it's "C-Insert", "S-Del", and "S-Ins" respectively. >> > > We might want to implement these bindings. >> > Actually, we already have these bindings by default. >> I tested them with C-h k, on a tty using its function keys, and they >> did not have those bindings. I am using master from June. > We have them on GUI frames. I think we also have them in tty frames, but many/most terminals are not able to transmit those keys properly. Stefan